Skip to main content

What is Happening in Ukraine?


Communist Party of the Russian Federation

 by Vyacheslav Tetekin


There is a war in Ukraine


Outwardly, it looks like an armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine. All political forces, including Left, have spoken out about these events. The range of assessments: from humanistic-emotional ("people are dying, stop the war") to purely class ("The West is pushing two oligarchic regimes"). In fact, this conflict has deep roots. When analysing the situation, we must consider both the national content of the class struggle and the class content of the national struggle.

What is Ukraine?

The territory of present-day Ukraine until the middle of the 17th Century was a sparsely populated space, contested by neighbouring countries. By the beginning of the 20th Century the lands of present-day Ukraine were divided between Poland, Austria-Hungary and Russia. After 1917 revolution some of these lands temporarily declared independence. In 1922 however, they joined the USSR as the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. So Ukraine gained statehood, although limited.

Ukraine was an agricultural country

To ensure its development in 1918 at the suggestion of Vladimir Lenin six Russian industrial regions including Donetsk and Lugansk, which had never been part of Ukraine, were transferred to Ukraine. In 1939 Galicia (Western Ukraine) was annexed to Ukraine, previously part of Poland. The current territory of Ukraine is the result of its entry into the USSR. It consists of disparate pieces: from Galicia (Lviv) with a strong influence of Catholicism to Eastern Ukraine, which strongly gravitates towards Russia.

Socialist Ukraine developed powerfully

Aircraft and rocket building, petro-chemistry, electric power industry (four nuclear power plants) and defence industries were added to the extraction of metal and coal. As part of the USSR Ukraine received not only the bulk of its current territory but economic potential making it 10th largest economy in Europe. Ukrainian politicians were dominant in the Soviet leadership. Khrushev, Brezhnev and Chernenko ran the USSR from 1953–1983.
    After the collapse of the USSR in December 1991, Ukraine became an independent state for the first time in its history. But this destroyed centuries-old economic integration with Russia. The ‘market’ model led to the de-industrialisation of Ukraine and a sharp drop in the standard of living of the population. On the basis of predatory privatisation, an oligarchic class arose.

Now it is the poorest country in Europe

The level of corruption and social differentiation is of the highest in the world. The manufacturing industry, except metallurgy, is practically destroyed. The economy rests on Western loans and money transfers from migrant labourers who left for Europe and Russia in search of work (about 10 million out of 45 million people), basically qualified specialists. The degradation of human capital has reached its limit. The country is on the verge of a national catastrophe.
    The population of Ukraine is strongly dissatisfied; however this dissatisfaction with pro-Western authorities is manipulated in such a way that each time even more pro-Western forces win the elections. In February 2014, a US- and NATO-backed state coup was carried out in Ukraine. The US State Department has publicly stated that it has invested $5 billion in its preparation.

Neo-Nazis came to power

These are, first of all, people from Western Ukraine (Galicia), which for centuries was under the rule of Poland and Austria-Hungary. Extremely nationalist, anti-Semitic, anti-Polish, Russophobic and anti-Communist sentiments are historically strong there. After Hitler's invasion of the USSR, German troops were greeted in Western Ukraine with flowers. SS divisions were formed there and fought against the Red Army. Local nationalists, led by Hitler's admirer Stephan Bandera, set about exterminating the Jewish population. In Ukraine about 1.5 million Jews were killed – one fourth of all Holocaust victims. During the ‘Volyn massacre’ in 1944 about 100,000 Poles were brutally murdered in Western Ukraine. Bandera’s men fought Soviet guerrillas and burned alive men, women and children in hundreds of villages in Belarus. Ukrainian nationalists who served as guards in German concentration camps became notorious for monstrous cruelty.
    After the war from 1945–1953, the USA and UK supported anti-communist and anti-Soviet rebels in Western Ukraine who unleashed terror against the civilian population. During these years Banderas killed about 50 thousand civilians. This is the nature of these forces – descendants and followers of fascists – who came to power after the 2014 coup. The traditions of anti-Polish, anti-Semitic and anti-Russian terror are very strong amongst the neo-Nazis who now really govern Ukraine. At least 42 opponents of the Nazis were burnt alive in the Trade Unions building in Odessa on 2nd May 2014.

It is an alliance of neo-Nazis with oligarchic capital

Banderas (like the SS stormtroopers in Germany) serve as a shock detachment of big business. The only difference is that the Banderas refrain from outright anti-Semitism, having established a class unity with the local oligarchy. The Banderas tightly control every move of state power, constantly blackmailing it with the threat of a coup. On the other hand, the policy of Ukraine is determined by the US Embassy in Kiev.
    The nature of the current Ukrainian state is an alliance of big capital and the state bureaucracy, relying on criminal and fascist elements under the full political and financial control of the USA.
    After 2014, Nazi ideology was implanted in Ukraine. The ‘Day of Victory’ over fascism on 9th May was cancelled. Ukrainian fascists – organisers and participants in the atrocities during the second world war – are officially recognised as national heroes. Every year torch-lit marches are held in honour of fascist criminals. Streets and squares are named after them. The Communist Party of Ukraine operates underground. Intimidation and political assassinations of politicians and journalists became the norm. Monuments to Lenin and everything related to the memory of life in the USSR are being destroyed.
    At the same time, an attempt began forcibly to assimilate the Russian population of Ukraine with the suppression of the Russian language. An attempt to introduce Afrikaans instead of English in South Africa led to the Soweto uprising in 1976. The same thing happened in Ukraine. An attempt to transfer school education from Russian into Ukrainian gave rise to powerful resistance in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions.

People took up arms

In May 2014 a referendum was held there, in which 87 per cent of citizens voted for independence. This is how the Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics (DPR and LPR respectively) arose. After several unsuccessful attempts to invade the LPR–DPR, the Nazis from Kiev switched over to terror. During eight years of shelling from large-calibre guns, more than 13,000 civilians, including children, women and elderly people were killed in the Donbas republics with the complete silence of the world community.
    The Communists of Russia take an active part in the defence of the LPR–DPR. Hundreds of communists are fighting the Nazis as part of the troops of the people's republics. Dozens of communists died in this struggle. In eight years the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) sent 93 convoys with humanitarian aid to these republics with a total weight of 13,000 tons and received thousands of children for rest and treatment in Russia. During all these years the CPRF, headed by Gennady Zyuganov, demanded that the leadership of Russia recognise of the independence of Donbas.
    In March 2015 at the initiative of Russia (with the participation of Germany and France) the Minsk agreements were concluded, which provided for the special status of the LPR–DPR within Ukraine. Ukraine however, evaded their implementation. With the support of the USA, Kiev was preparing to crush the LPR–DPR by force of arms. The USA, UK and other NATO members provided training for the Ukrainian army. They constructed over 30 major military installations in Ukraine, including 15 Pentagon laboratories for the development of bacteriological weapons (cholera, the plague and other deadly diseases). Ukraine with its four nuclear power stations and huge scientific-technical potential is able to construct an A-bomb. This intention was publicly declared. There was a danger of deployment of US cruise missiles. The situation in Ukraine increasingly threatened Russia's security.

In December 2021 Russia proposed to the USA to talk about non-expansion of NATO

The USA and NATO ignored the proposal. In January 2022 Russia warned that it would be forced to take additional measures to protect its security. At the same time it became known that Ukraine had concentrated 150,000 servicemen and Nazi battalions in Donbas. Kiev, backed by the USA, was preparing to regain control over Donbas through war this March.
    On 22nd February President Putin announced the recognition of the independence of the LPR–DPR. On 25th February the Russian Armed Forces operation began
    Russia is not going to occupy Ukraine. The purpose of the operation is the liberation of Ukraine from the Nazis and its neutrality (refusal to join NATO).
    The tactics of the Russian troops are, whilst attacking military facilities, to minimise the casualties amongst the civilian population and Ukrainian military, and to avoid destruction of civilian infrastructure. They are brotherly people. We will continue to live together. However, the Bandera Nazis use the most disgusting tactics of the German fascists, using civilians and their houses as human shields. They install artillery and tanks in residential areas, forbid citizens to leave war zones, turning hundreds of thousands of people into hostages.
    This nefarious Nazi tactic is not condemned in the West. It is the USA, waging an information war through the media controlled by them (only Russia Today resists), that are interested in the war. The USA strikes not only at Russia but also at Europe.
    The NATO war against Yugoslavia in 1999 was a means of destabilising the European Union (EU). Today the USA’s main goal is to prevent Russian gas supplies via the Nord Stream-2 pipeline to force Europe to buy more expensive liquefied gas from the USA, thereby sharply weakening Germany and other EU countries. The volume of trade between Russia and the EU is $260 billion per year whilst with the USA it is $23 billion – 10 times less. Therefore the sanctions imposed at the request of the USA hit, first of all, Europe. The events in Ukraine are yet another American war for control of the world.
    By the way, the claims about global nature of boycott of Russia are false. BRICS countries (Brazil, India, China and South Africa), constituting 43 per cent of the world population, did not support sanctions. China is the fist and India the third biggest economies of the world. Sanctions were not supported by Asia (excluding Japan and South Korea with their US military bases), by the Middle East, by the largest countries of Latin America and by the majority of the developing world.
    For 30 years I have been one of the most active critics of the domestic and foreign policy of the Russian elite. In its class character, the oligarchic-bureaucratic power in Russia is not much different from the power in Ukraine (except without fascism and full US control).
    In those unfortunately rare cases when the leaders of Russia pursue a line that meets the historical interests of the country and the people however, the principle of ‘automatic’ criticism is hardly appropriate.
    I have long argued that sanctions will have a beneficial effect on getting rid of Russia's imposed dependence on the West in various areas of life. The Russian government is already taking the first steps in this direction. The task of the left forces is to vigorously encourage the authorities to change not only foreign policy, but also the socio-economic course, which does not correspond to the interests of the people.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lenin Was Right: The Ukrainian war proves that

International Ukraine Anti-Fascist Solidarity held a successful 'hybrid' meeting in central London earlier in November. Speakers from Britain, Ireland, Ukraine, the Russian Federation and Poland spoke on the platform or via Zoom on the topic 'The struggle against Banderite fascism and the future of Ukraine'. This is the contribution from Konrad Rękas, a Polish journalist and political commentator. In 1913, the world was convinced that the threat of war was completely impossible, which was related with the progress of civilisation, the development of science, and especially the international system based on the so-called concert of powers, international conferences during which colonial empires shared global spheres of influence. However, in reality, under the skin of this alleged belle epoque there were insurmountable contradictions and class conflicts, and enlightened minds already saw the spectre of a crisis that would surpass all previous problems of capitalism. Ne

Solidarity in Dublin

  Solidarity with Gaza and the Donbas in Dublin by Theo Russell Activists gathered last Saturday in front of the General Post Office in O'Connell Street, central Dublin, to call for an end to arms supplies to Ukraine and Israel, and an end to NATO aggression in Ukraine and Yemen and Israel's brutal military operation in the Gaza Strip. The protesters also called for ceasefires in Ukraine, Gaza and Yemen. The General Post Office, built in the early 19th century when Ireland was a British colony, is one of the Irish capital’s famous land-marks because it served as the headquarters of the leaders of the 1916 Easter Rising against British rule in Ireland.  Activists  from the Truth and Neutrality Alliance that is based in Ireland, the New Communist Party of Britain and International Ukraine Anti Fascist Solidarity (IUAFS) took part  along with citizens from Russia and Croatia. The IUAFS is a united front supported by the NCP, Socialist Fight, the Consistent Democrats and the Britis

Eco-Terrorism – NATO’s Dirty Secret War

A few days ago, an article appeared in the New York Times.  It revealed the decade-long campaign the CIA has funded in Ukraine sponsoring regime change, with military training and arms provision, long before the start of Russia’s Special Military Operation (SMO) just over 2 years ago.  NATO’s war on Russia has been decades in the making, a war of psyops, lies and half-truths with built in deniability of outrageous provocations by proxy. Russia has responded with offers of negotiations, diplomacy and finally the pre-emptive invasion of the Donbass to protect the rights of the Crimeans who freely chose to join the Russian Federation after their overwhelming support via the 2014 referendum. Conspicuous on the part of NATO has been the willingness to use eco-terrorism as part of its arsenal alongside the financial tools of sanctions and media manipulation, especially censorship, misinformation and disinformation. The blowing up of Nordstream 1 was the biggest man-made ecological disaster i