Skip to main content

Rifts in the communist movement


The Ukraine war has divided communists around the world. The worst position is that of the Communist Party of Britain (CPB) which calls it “Putin’s war” and demands an unconditional Russian withdrawal from Ukraine – which is also NATO’s demand . They also denounced what they called “Russian military adventurism” in a joint statement the CPB sponsored that only attracted the support of nine other communist and workers’ parties.

CPB election leaflets in the May local elections all carried the following statement "Communists opposed Putin’s invasion of Ukraine from the first hour. Putin and his cronies are opposed to Socialism and Communism. They stole what belonged to the Russian people. We say: Stop the war, Start the peace".

It didn’t do them any good. Five of their seven candidates got less than a hundred votes apiece. The others got the majestic sums of 119 and 126 votes. The CPB’s Blackheath Westcombe hopeful was beaten by the Official Monster Raving Loony candidate by 125 votes to 79.

Communist Party of Greece

A more significant section of the movement led by the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) argues that Russia is an imperialist country and that the war is simply a quarrel between two imperialist blocs. This is a view rejected outright by the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) that leads the opposition in the Russian parliament and is the largest communist party in Russia. The second biggest, the Russian Communist Workers Party (RCWP), which does think Russia is “imperialist”, nevertheless supports the Russian intervention in support of the people of the Donbas.

In March the KKE sponsored a joint statement that said “the decision of the Russian Federation to initially recognise the “independence” of the so-called “Peoples’ Republics” in Donbas and then to proceed to a Russian military intervention, which is taking place under the pretext of Russia’s “self-defence”, the “demilitarisation” and “defascistisation” of Ukraine, was not made to protect the people of the region or peace but to promote the interests of Russian monopolies in Ukrainian territory and their fierce competition with Western monopolies”.

The New Communist Party of Britain (NCP), along with the majority of the members of the Solidnet group it was sent to, including the CPRF and the RCWP, refused to sign it. But some 40 others did.

In April the Secretariat of the Communist Initiative (ECI) , a KKE-inspired European communist forum, issued a draft statement for May Day to the same effect. A number of parties, including the NCP and the RCWP, proposed amendments which forced the Secretariat to water-down the final statement.

But a few days later the Secretariat issued a statement for Victory Day on 9th May without any consultation that said “the Second World War, like the first one and the current war in Ukraine, is a result of imperialist contradictions and competition for the redivision of markets and spheres of influence. The people pay a heavy price for the condemnable Russian invasion of Ukraine, like the previous US-NATO-EU interventions that led to it: dead and wounded people, refugees, extremely expensive energy and fuel, and high prices”. This has led to the resignation of the Hungarian Workers Party from the Secretariat.

Meanwhile the KKE has launched public attacks, in their daily paper and online, on the stand of the CPRF and the RCWP in support of the Russian intervention which have been rebuffed in equally robust terms by the leaderships of both Russian parties.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 29, 2022 at 2:27 PM

    This is the response of the RCWP to the KKE https://actofdefiance.wordpress.com/2022/06/28/international-department-of-the-central-committee-of-the-rcwp-on-the-class-understanding-of-the-struggle-against-fascism-and-the-mistakes-of-the-leftism-of-the-greek-comrades/

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJune 30, 2022 at 9:36 AM

    Communists worldwide should be united and not split over the role of Russia in the Ukraine.

    The CPB in Britain is not speaking in the name of many communists and working class activists, when it tries to equate Russian nationalism with US led imperialism.
    The normally strictly Marxist Leninist KKE by condemning Russia is siding up with the imperialists and Trotskyists and revisionists.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ukrainians flee to avoid conscription

by Alex Miller Today most Ukrainians have lost their patriotic zeal. Guided by a common instinct of self-preservation and fear of serious injury or unwanted death they are not ready to sacrifice themselves. The new Ukrainian law on military mobilisation further aggravates the situation with conscription into the army. Numerous attempts of government to straighten out the mobilisation process have generally failed. Territorial Recruiting Centres (known as TCK) cannot meet the government’s recruitment needs. Large-scale military defeats, a high number of losses, an acute shortage of weapons, the complete absence of social benefits from the state, -- all these creates conditions when the majority of Ukrainian men prefer to flee to Europe and other countries.  According to the Belgian newspaper, Politico, during this time more than 650,000 Ukrainian men fit for service fled from the country. However, the actual statistical figures are much higher. The London Guardian on 29th June 2024...
Post a Comment
Read more

NATO in deep crisis as the dangers to Zelensky grow

  by Theo Russell The current direction of the war in Ukraine has created an acute crisis in Western capitals, above all in Washington, and the position of Vladimir Zelensky, the president elected on a promise to end the war in Eastern Ukraine, now hangs by a thread. We must make clear here that this is not a war between Ukraine and Russia; this is a war forced on Russia by the NATO alliance. Ukraine is merely a proxy for NATO and is paying a horrific price for this war. The weaknesses of the once mighty NATO alliance have been exposed: after decades of relocating factories to developing countries they have now discovered that they are no longer able to produce sufficient weapons for a major sustained war. In contrast Russia, which Western experts love to claim has a GDP the size of Italy, has proved to be a manufacturing superpower with a highly skilled workforce and mighty technological and scientific resources. Russia has not only increased arms production, from bullets to hyper...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eco-Terrorism – NATO’s Dirty Secret War

A few days ago, an article appeared in the New York Times.  It revealed the decade-long campaign the CIA has funded in Ukraine sponsoring regime change, with military training and arms provision, long before the start of Russia’s Special Military Operation (SMO) just over 2 years ago.  NATO’s war on Russia has been decades in the making, a war of psyops, lies and half-truths with built in deniability of outrageous provocations by proxy. Russia has responded with offers of negotiations, diplomacy and finally the pre-emptive invasion of the Donbass to protect the rights of the Crimeans who freely chose to join the Russian Federation after their overwhelming support via the 2014 referendum. Conspicuous on the part of NATO has been the willingness to use eco-terrorism as part of its arsenal alongside the financial tools of sanctions and media manipulation, especially censorship, misinformation and disinformation. The blowing up of Nordstream 1 was the biggest man-made ecological d...
Post a Comment
Read more