Skip to main content

Canadian communists call for peace

As the war in Ukraine continues and political tensions escalate, the danger of an expanded conflict involving nuclear weapons is rapidly increasing. Warning that time is running out, the Communist Party of Canada has called on the Trudeau government to immediately end its involvement in the war, withdraw all Canadian troops from the region and press for a negotiated political solution now.
    In a statement issued at the beginning of October, the Party notes that the Canadian government “sees the war in Ukraine as a proxy war against Russia and is prepared to finance this war until every last Ukrainian soldier and civilian is dead.”
     Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland indicated as much during her budget speech in April: “[The world] can be safe only once the Russian tyrant and his armies are entirely vanquished. And that is what we are counting on the brave people of Ukraine to do. Because they are fighting our fight… it is in our urgent national interest to ensure that they have the missiles and the money they need to win. And that is what this Budget helps to provide.”
    By supporting the war and its escalation, Canada and its NATO allies are complicit in setting the stage for what could become the greatest of all war crimes: nuclear annihilation.
    In fact, the “democratic” West already bears responsibility for prolonging the conflict. In April, when negotiations between Russia and Ukraine were underway and making progress towards a political solution, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson directly intervened to squelch the deal and to ramp up the war. In the months since, thousands more people have died, millions more are homeless and refugees, and the war has escalated.
    “By nixing peace negotiations and ramping up the war, NATO, the US, EU and Canada have left Russia with few options,” reads the Communist Party statement. “Putin’s response…that Russia will defend itself and the Russian-speaking the Donbas – who have been asking Russia to intervene to defend them against the Azov Battalion’s military assaults since the UN-brokered Kiev Agreement was scuppered by Ukraine’s far-right government in 2014-15 – was entirely predictable.”
    The Canadian government – and those of its NATO allies – could have made a different choice. Fully aware of the nuclear danger presented by both weaponry and nuclear generating stations in the war zone, Ottawa could have stepped back and supported the negotiated settlement that Russia and Ukraine were working toward.
    Instead, Trudeau and company made the choice to discourage a peace deal, increase support for the war, and send more troops, weapons and money to Europe. They made the choice to actively support NATO deployments which surround Russia with troops and weapons.
Canada chose to extend and expand the war
    It’s a war that is, as the Canadian communists points out, highly profitable for the US military industrial complex and for the North American oil and gas industry. But it is not profitable for the world’s peoples, whose organized and mobilized opposition can stop it.
    “Public opinion in Canada is decisive to pressure the Canadian government to step back and to press for a negotiated political solution to the war in Europe. The labour and democratic movements must resist widespread war propaganda and demand peace. The alternative is unthinkable.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ukrainians flee to avoid conscription

by Alex Miller Today most Ukrainians have lost their patriotic zeal. Guided by a common instinct of self-preservation and fear of serious injury or unwanted death they are not ready to sacrifice themselves. The new Ukrainian law on military mobilisation further aggravates the situation with conscription into the army. Numerous attempts of government to straighten out the mobilisation process have generally failed. Territorial Recruiting Centres (known as TCK) cannot meet the government’s recruitment needs. Large-scale military defeats, a high number of losses, an acute shortage of weapons, the complete absence of social benefits from the state, -- all these creates conditions when the majority of Ukrainian men prefer to flee to Europe and other countries.  According to the Belgian newspaper, Politico, during this time more than 650,000 Ukrainian men fit for service fled from the country. However, the actual statistical figures are much higher. The London Guardian on 29th June 2024...

NATO in deep crisis as the dangers to Zelensky grow

  by Theo Russell The current direction of the war in Ukraine has created an acute crisis in Western capitals, above all in Washington, and the position of Vladimir Zelensky, the president elected on a promise to end the war in Eastern Ukraine, now hangs by a thread. We must make clear here that this is not a war between Ukraine and Russia; this is a war forced on Russia by the NATO alliance. Ukraine is merely a proxy for NATO and is paying a horrific price for this war. The weaknesses of the once mighty NATO alliance have been exposed: after decades of relocating factories to developing countries they have now discovered that they are no longer able to produce sufficient weapons for a major sustained war. In contrast Russia, which Western experts love to claim has a GDP the size of Italy, has proved to be a manufacturing superpower with a highly skilled workforce and mighty technological and scientific resources. Russia has not only increased arms production, from bullets to hyper...

Britain joins the war in Ukraine

by K Hill While the US has brought about regime change in Ukraine with the Maidan coup in 2014, installing a thinly disguised neo-Nazi government of Banderites and corrupt politicians to loot its resources, sell its land and saddle it with massive debts thanks to dodgy IMF loans, the UK has been heavily involved in the training of their military – now the second largest European army (after Turkey) in NATO.  The UK involvement has involved everything from bringing Ukrainian commanders for "special training" in the UK, Nazi tattoos on show much to the embarrassment of the British media, to the existence of special advisors, in reality SAS and SBS units, to supervise "on the ground" the attacks on Snake Island and Kerch Bridge.  This is the real reason our British press has been so obsessed with these two "targets" over the past two years, despite their lack of strategic importance, because they are great PR and distract the British public from the grim real...