Skip to main content

Prisoners of war – in Russia and Ukraine


 By Evgeny Glebov

Prisoners of war are usually treated according to rank. Officers get better treatment. They can be used as camp supervisors. They can refuse to work at all. But other ranks often end up doing heavy, and sometimes meaningless jobs, poorly fed and treated quite cruelly. The Nazis and the Japanese militarists even carried out hideous experiments on them.
POWs have, however, long been treated differently in Russia. In the 18th century Peter the Great set new standards. The Czar understood that they would have to be sent home when war ended . On his orders prisoners were well kept and paid the going rate for their work. Many retained fond memories of their days in captivity.
It was the same in Soviet times. For example, there was a separate Main Directorate for Internees and Prisoners of War within the interior ministry (the NKVD) the GUIVP, and not the Gulag. The food standards in the GUIVP were higher than in the Gulag, set at the level of the norms for Soviet workers.
Prisoners of war had to work but they could choose their own foremen. At first, of course, the officers were the foremen, but gradually life put everyone in their place. If an officer could only command, and not really lead the team, then he was soon replaced.
Ordinary soldiers retained many kind memories of Soviet captivity. But Wehrmacht and the Japanese officers didn’t like being treated the same as other ranks and obliged to engage in productive work. One of the few exceptions was Konrad Lorenz, a well-known zoologist and Nobel Prize winner. He was a doctor and in captivity he learned a lot from Russian colleagues. He praised the Russian captivity very much.
The same cannot be said about the Ukrainians. They treat their Russian POWs in the traditional Western way. The Russians are held in very harsh conditions. Many are bullied, mutilated and tortured.
Ukrainians in Russian captivity are kept according to the usual norms of prisoners in Russia. The food , treatment and the absence of abuse comes as a pleasant surprise to them.
Many Russian citizens are surprised by the ongoing exchange of prisoners during the conflict. POWs are usually freed after a truce and after former enemy soldiers at least partially make amends for their crimes.
Now it is happening during in the course of hostilities. War criminals have a completely different attitude than ordinary prisoners of war. And they very often do not even have time to acknowledge their guilt for participating in the crimes of their regime.
Moreover, the Ukrainian side wants only to exchange officers and stubborn Nazis. They don’t care about ordinary soldiers.
It is quite possible that the Ukrainian side is deliberately exploliting traditional Russian humanism for its own purposes. This is a typical psychology of criminals - to take kindness for weakness. But they do not understand that in the end they will have to answer for everything.
Russia sees the exchange of prisoners as a way to get our people out of trouble. But the Kiev military authorities are pursuing much more cunning goals. Zelensky refuses to exchange his wounded because they can no longer fight. He chooses only the healthy.
First, they demand the release of only physically fit prisoners to send them back to the front. Some have ended back in Russian POW camps two or three times over the past year.
What is interesting for a researcher, but angers me as a person is that they easily track the condition of prisoners of war on social networks. And most importantly, they very accurately seek the exchange of those who have retained their Nazi ideology in captivity.
We are forced to exchange these Nazi just to get our Russian POWs out. And as a result, quite motivated Nazis again lead the units of Ukrainians, who are sent to the meat grinder on the battle line. It seems that something needs to be changed in the ways of dealing with the Kiev military on prisoner exchanges…
MART

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lenin Was Right: The Ukrainian war proves that

International Ukraine Anti-Fascist Solidarity held a successful 'hybrid' meeting in central London earlier in November. Speakers from Britain, Ireland, Ukraine, the Russian Federation and Poland spoke on the platform or via Zoom on the topic 'The struggle against Banderite fascism and the future of Ukraine'. This is the contribution from Konrad Rękas, a Polish journalist and political commentator. In 1913, the world was convinced that the threat of war was completely impossible, which was related with the progress of civilisation, the development of science, and especially the international system based on the so-called concert of powers, international conferences during which colonial empires shared global spheres of influence. However, in reality, under the skin of this alleged belle epoque there were insurmountable contradictions and class conflicts, and enlightened minds already saw the spectre of a crisis that would surpass all previous problems of capitalism. Ne

Solidarity in Dublin

  Solidarity with Gaza and the Donbas in Dublin by Theo Russell Activists gathered last Saturday in front of the General Post Office in O'Connell Street, central Dublin, to call for an end to arms supplies to Ukraine and Israel, and an end to NATO aggression in Ukraine and Yemen and Israel's brutal military operation in the Gaza Strip. The protesters also called for ceasefires in Ukraine, Gaza and Yemen. The General Post Office, built in the early 19th century when Ireland was a British colony, is one of the Irish capital’s famous land-marks because it served as the headquarters of the leaders of the 1916 Easter Rising against British rule in Ireland.  Activists  from the Truth and Neutrality Alliance that is based in Ireland, the New Communist Party of Britain and International Ukraine Anti Fascist Solidarity (IUAFS) took part  along with citizens from Russia and Croatia. The IUAFS is a united front supported by the NCP, Socialist Fight, the Consistent Democrats and the Britis

Eco-Terrorism – NATO’s Dirty Secret War

A few days ago, an article appeared in the New York Times.  It revealed the decade-long campaign the CIA has funded in Ukraine sponsoring regime change, with military training and arms provision, long before the start of Russia’s Special Military Operation (SMO) just over 2 years ago.  NATO’s war on Russia has been decades in the making, a war of psyops, lies and half-truths with built in deniability of outrageous provocations by proxy. Russia has responded with offers of negotiations, diplomacy and finally the pre-emptive invasion of the Donbass to protect the rights of the Crimeans who freely chose to join the Russian Federation after their overwhelming support via the 2014 referendum. Conspicuous on the part of NATO has been the willingness to use eco-terrorism as part of its arsenal alongside the financial tools of sanctions and media manipulation, especially censorship, misinformation and disinformation. The blowing up of Nordstream 1 was the biggest man-made ecological disaster i