Skip to main content

Prisoners of war – in Russia and Ukraine


 By Evgeny Glebov

Prisoners of war are usually treated according to rank. Officers get better treatment. They can be used as camp supervisors. They can refuse to work at all. But other ranks often end up doing heavy, and sometimes meaningless jobs, poorly fed and treated quite cruelly. The Nazis and the Japanese militarists even carried out hideous experiments on them.
POWs have, however, long been treated differently in Russia. In the 18th century Peter the Great set new standards. The Czar understood that they would have to be sent home when war ended . On his orders prisoners were well kept and paid the going rate for their work. Many retained fond memories of their days in captivity.
It was the same in Soviet times. For example, there was a separate Main Directorate for Internees and Prisoners of War within the interior ministry (the NKVD) the GUIVP, and not the Gulag. The food standards in the GUIVP were higher than in the Gulag, set at the level of the norms for Soviet workers.
Prisoners of war had to work but they could choose their own foremen. At first, of course, the officers were the foremen, but gradually life put everyone in their place. If an officer could only command, and not really lead the team, then he was soon replaced.
Ordinary soldiers retained many kind memories of Soviet captivity. But Wehrmacht and the Japanese officers didn’t like being treated the same as other ranks and obliged to engage in productive work. One of the few exceptions was Konrad Lorenz, a well-known zoologist and Nobel Prize winner. He was a doctor and in captivity he learned a lot from Russian colleagues. He praised the Russian captivity very much.
The same cannot be said about the Ukrainians. They treat their Russian POWs in the traditional Western way. The Russians are held in very harsh conditions. Many are bullied, mutilated and tortured.
Ukrainians in Russian captivity are kept according to the usual norms of prisoners in Russia. The food , treatment and the absence of abuse comes as a pleasant surprise to them.
Many Russian citizens are surprised by the ongoing exchange of prisoners during the conflict. POWs are usually freed after a truce and after former enemy soldiers at least partially make amends for their crimes.
Now it is happening during in the course of hostilities. War criminals have a completely different attitude than ordinary prisoners of war. And they very often do not even have time to acknowledge their guilt for participating in the crimes of their regime.
Moreover, the Ukrainian side wants only to exchange officers and stubborn Nazis. They don’t care about ordinary soldiers.
It is quite possible that the Ukrainian side is deliberately exploliting traditional Russian humanism for its own purposes. This is a typical psychology of criminals - to take kindness for weakness. But they do not understand that in the end they will have to answer for everything.
Russia sees the exchange of prisoners as a way to get our people out of trouble. But the Kiev military authorities are pursuing much more cunning goals. Zelensky refuses to exchange his wounded because they can no longer fight. He chooses only the healthy.
First, they demand the release of only physically fit prisoners to send them back to the front. Some have ended back in Russian POW camps two or three times over the past year.
What is interesting for a researcher, but angers me as a person is that they easily track the condition of prisoners of war on social networks. And most importantly, they very accurately seek the exchange of those who have retained their Nazi ideology in captivity.
We are forced to exchange these Nazi just to get our Russian POWs out. And as a result, quite motivated Nazis again lead the units of Ukrainians, who are sent to the meat grinder on the battle line. It seems that something needs to be changed in the ways of dealing with the Kiev military on prisoner exchanges…
MART

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ukraine peace talks: seeing through the blizzard of confusion and spin

by Theo Russell Since the historic summit in Alaska between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and their top level ministers, our media has been flooded by a tidal wave of deception and diversion, alongside a new campaign of Banderite inspired anti-Russian demonisation. The entire world recognises – with the possible exception of senior British military and intelligence chiefs – that NATO has lost the war in Ukraine, leaving total defeat or a negotiated settlement the only possible ways to end the conflict.  As of now, Trump’s position is that a comprehensive, lasting peace deal is preferable to a ceasefire, and that secondary sanctions are off the table. As we know Trump can flip his policies on a whim, but there is reason for optimism that genuinely he wants a settlement in Ukraine. This shift in Washington has thrown Europe’s leaders into a state of panic. The leaders of the ‘Coalition of the Willing’ are facing a political disaster on a massive scale, and as a result they are desp...

Nato press gangs in Ukraine

by a Kiev observer   American imperialism continues to ruin all states that call themselves democratic and independent. In fact, many countries have already lost their independence. Some lost it along with their currency; others by giving away their army. The White House continues to hide its financial greed behind the illusion of possible global protection. At the same time, regular workers and civil servants have difficulty understanding what is really behind the foolish statements of “collective security” peddled by the bourgeois media. An example of the realities that every worker will face in the near future is in the war in Ukraine. Despite all the statements we hear from Western media, the war in Ukraine was started by imperialism, and the reason it did it was to make more money. This war, however, has also exposed the steps and measures that modern capitalist governments under Nato command have taken in Ukraine, and shows what they will do in their own countries in the futu...

Ukraine: A Search for Identity and Freedom

by John Maryon Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians are predominantly from the East Slav sub-group of the Slavic people.  Crimean Tatars form an important ethnic group of the population of Crimea.  The fertile lands of mineral rich Ukraine were for centuries shared between the Poles and the Mongols.  By 1500 the Ottoman empire had expanded and taken over South East Ukraine and Crimea.  In 1654, following years of conflict with the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth, the Cossack leader of Ukraine pledged allegiance to the Czardom of Russia in exchange of protection. Russian influence increased and in 1797 Catherine the Great established the port city of Odessa and the region became an important part of the Russian Empire.  Today most people have heard of the Crimean War, Florence Nightingale, Balaclava and the Charge of the Light Brigade.   It was an imperialist conflict for Middle East influence between Russia and an alliance of France, Britain and Turkey....