Skip to main content

The Huge Elephant in the Room!

 
The Chinese Embassy in Moscow has published a list of countries that the United States bombed after World War II


Japan: August 6 and 9 1945 
Korea and China: 1950–1953 (Korean War)
Guatemala: 1954, 1960, 1967–1969
Indonesia: 1958
Cuba: 1959–1961
Congo: 1964
Laos: 1964–1973
Vietnam: 1961–1973
Cambodia: 1969–1970
Grenada: 1983
Lebanon: 1983, 1984 (attacks on targets in Lebanon and Syria)
Libya: 1986, 2011, 2015
El Salvador: 1980
Nicaragua: 1980
Iran: 1987
Panama: 1989
Iraq: 1991 (Gulf War), 1991–2003 (US and British invasions), 2003–2015
Kuwait: 1991
Somalia: 1993, 2007–2008, 2011
Bosnia: 1994, 1995
Sudan: 1998
Afghanistan: 1998, 2001–2015
Yugoslavia: 1999
Yemen: 2002, 2009, 2011, 2024, 2025
Pakistan: 2007–2015
Syria: 2014–2015

This list consists of approximately 30 countries. China has stressed that "we must never forget who the real threat to the world is".

Then the question arises:

Has Western society ever expressed anger at the USA?
Has there ever been a strong voice raised against it?
Has there ever been a single time when sanctions have been imposed on the US?
This entire world system, which we call the "international community", has been a silent spectator, while the US attacks countries around the world like bandits and turns their dreams into terrible nightmares.
No condemnation, no reprimand, no resentment of any kind.
A cowardly, shameless, and hypocritical global conscience.
What is needed is that this list be broadcasted repeatedly on every possible platform. Videos should be made that expose all these Western hypocrites and remind us of every fact of the crimes committed by the USA around the world.
The list was released by the Chinese Embassy in Russia as a political and moral message at a time when the international media and Western countries were strongly condemning Iran's attack on Israel, but the past of the United States itself was being completely ignored.
The list was published to expose the double standards that the United States and the West adopt in matters of human rights, international law, and global security.
When Iran retaliated against Israel, the United States and its allies began to call Iran a "global threat". The Chinese Embassy issued the list in response to this critical campaign to remind that the real threat is a country that has bombed more than 30 countries since World War II.
China's position is that the United States is not qualified to speak from any moral position, because its own past and present are full of human rights violations and global aggression.
China sent a broader message by releasing the list:
"The world must remember who the real threat is. Western media and governments act with hypocrisy, and when the US commits massacres, they remain silent."
This move is not just a diplomatic or informational one, but also a political response and a moral charge sheet against the one-sided narrative being spread by the USA and its allies. 
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 24, 2025 at 11:09 PM

    Very true all this. Well done China. Humanity needs a new International, and it is urgent.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ukrainians flee to avoid conscription

by Alex Miller Today most Ukrainians have lost their patriotic zeal. Guided by a common instinct of self-preservation and fear of serious injury or unwanted death they are not ready to sacrifice themselves. The new Ukrainian law on military mobilisation further aggravates the situation with conscription into the army. Numerous attempts of government to straighten out the mobilisation process have generally failed. Territorial Recruiting Centres (known as TCK) cannot meet the government’s recruitment needs. Large-scale military defeats, a high number of losses, an acute shortage of weapons, the complete absence of social benefits from the state, -- all these creates conditions when the majority of Ukrainian men prefer to flee to Europe and other countries.  According to the Belgian newspaper, Politico, during this time more than 650,000 Ukrainian men fit for service fled from the country. However, the actual statistical figures are much higher. The London Guardian on 29th June 2024...
Post a Comment
Read more

NATO in deep crisis as the dangers to Zelensky grow

  by Theo Russell The current direction of the war in Ukraine has created an acute crisis in Western capitals, above all in Washington, and the position of Vladimir Zelensky, the president elected on a promise to end the war in Eastern Ukraine, now hangs by a thread. We must make clear here that this is not a war between Ukraine and Russia; this is a war forced on Russia by the NATO alliance. Ukraine is merely a proxy for NATO and is paying a horrific price for this war. The weaknesses of the once mighty NATO alliance have been exposed: after decades of relocating factories to developing countries they have now discovered that they are no longer able to produce sufficient weapons for a major sustained war. In contrast Russia, which Western experts love to claim has a GDP the size of Italy, has proved to be a manufacturing superpower with a highly skilled workforce and mighty technological and scientific resources. Russia has not only increased arms production, from bullets to hyper...
Post a Comment
Read more

Britain joins the war in Ukraine

by K Hill While the US has brought about regime change in Ukraine with the Maidan coup in 2014, installing a thinly disguised neo-Nazi government of Banderites and corrupt politicians to loot its resources, sell its land and saddle it with massive debts thanks to dodgy IMF loans, the UK has been heavily involved in the training of their military – now the second largest European army (after Turkey) in NATO.  The UK involvement has involved everything from bringing Ukrainian commanders for "special training" in the UK, Nazi tattoos on show much to the embarrassment of the British media, to the existence of special advisors, in reality SAS and SBS units, to supervise "on the ground" the attacks on Snake Island and Kerch Bridge.  This is the real reason our British press has been so obsessed with these two "targets" over the past two years, despite their lack of strategic importance, because they are great PR and distract the British public from the grim real...
Post a Comment
Read more