Skip to main content

An Outrage Against Civil Liberties!


International Ukraine Anti-Fascist Solidarity statement on the Galloways’ detention

The detention of George and Gayatri Galloway on 27th September is an outrage against civil liberties and basic democratic rights, and a very sinister attack on one of the best-known left-wing politicians in Britain, and his family. It is an attack on the democratic rights of all working-class people and the labour and anti-imperialist movement generally by the pro-NATO, anti-Russian militarist and Zionist government of Starmer. IUAFS condemn this act utterly and declare our full solidarity with George and Gayatri against this sinister attack.
After arriving in Gatwick Airport on a flight from Abu Dhabi on 27th September after celebrating their wedding anniversary in Moscow, George and Gayatri were picked up by armed “anti-terrorist” police. They were told “you are not under arrest, but you are not free to leave. You do not have the right to remain silent. If you do not comply and cooperate, and answer any and all of my questions, you will be automatically committing an offence under the Act”. That is, schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
This permits detentions and searches at ports, borders and airports, without any consideration of ‘reasonable suspicion’ that the victim has any involvement in any form of terrorism, and denies those questioned the right to silence – indeed this draconian law says that any attempt by a victim to exercise the right to silence as under ordinary criminal law, puts them at risk of conviction for a criminal offence itself. It also gives the cops the right to demand passwords and other access keys to social media and other private electronic repositories, and the right to confiscate and examine electronic equipment such as phones, laptops etc. Accordingly, laptops and phones belonging to the Galloways were confiscated by the cops and when they were finally released, after four hours of questioning for George, and five hours for Gayatri, they were stranded with no means to contact anyone else to inform them of their whereabouts.
They were also lied to by the cops, as George was told that his wife was at liberty and in the process of contacting solicitors etc, when she was also detained and subjected to a longer interrogation than her husband. At a 29th September press conference that the Galloways held in Belfast with their specialist civil liberties lawyer, Kevin Winters, they announced that they were challenging their detention legally under articles 5, 8, 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights and demanding the return of their electronics.
George Galloway is one of the best known and most elected politicians in the UK. He is also the leader of the Workers Party of Britain, a legal political party. His weekly YouTube show has 5 million views – a bigger audience than much of the bourgeois press. Galloway and his party are hated by much of the ruling class in Britain. They are fiercely on the right side in two major conflicts between imperialism and its victims in shooting wars – siding with the Palestinians against Zionist genocide and siding with the Donbass people against a Western backed NATO proxy war in East Ukraine where outright Nazis are the weapon to eliminate the Russian/Russophone population there. It is obvious that there were no grounds whatsoever for the state to remotely suspect him or his wife of any involvement in terrorism or anything like it. Galloway and the Workers Party have questionable views on migration, climate change and other questions regarding the rights of some minorities such as gays and trans, but we have no hesitation in denouncing this act of political persecution against them.
This detention, like those of several journalists and activist such as Craig Murray, Sarah Wilkinson and Richard Medhurst, had nothing to do with ‘terrorism’ in any shape of form. These all are about intimidation and harassment of political dissidents from the West’s involvement in genocidal wars in Palestine and the Donbass. In many cases, including those of the Galloways, they were about finding a pretext to seize electronics to find others to persecute. The case of Farhad Ansari illustrates this perfectly, as it was clear that the purpose of his recent Section 7 detention was to seize legally privileged material that is covered by client confidentiality rules. He is the eminent civil liberties lawyer who is bringing a case under the appeal provision in Schedule 3 of the same Terrorism Act 2000, to overturn the proscription of the Palestinian political party Hamas by the British government. This proscription was done in pursuit of genocide, as the effect of this mischaracterisation is that obviously civilian functions in Gaza: civil administration, medical people, and anyone else involved in ordinary civil society activities in Gaza can be defined as ‘terrorist’ and murdered with impunity by Israel. The Starmer government is up to its neck in funding and arming Israel for these purposes.
The proscription of Palestine Action is the ultimate expression of this persecution of dissent against Starmer’s support for such genocidal campaigns. That is up for judicial review in November, and the government is desperately trying to stop that case being heard. Then there is the case of the 2024 raid on the home of Electronic Intifada journalist Asa Winstanley, where the cops were found by a judge to have acted unlawfully.
The detention of George and Gayatri Galloway is yet another escalation of attacks on democratic rights ordered by this government. Hands off the Galloways! Down with genocidal fake ‘anti-terrorism’ laws that are really aimed at persecution of opponents of Western terrorism and genocide!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ukrainians flee to avoid conscription

by Alex Miller Today most Ukrainians have lost their patriotic zeal. Guided by a common instinct of self-preservation and fear of serious injury or unwanted death they are not ready to sacrifice themselves. The new Ukrainian law on military mobilisation further aggravates the situation with conscription into the army. Numerous attempts of government to straighten out the mobilisation process have generally failed. Territorial Recruiting Centres (known as TCK) cannot meet the government’s recruitment needs. Large-scale military defeats, a high number of losses, an acute shortage of weapons, the complete absence of social benefits from the state, -- all these creates conditions when the majority of Ukrainian men prefer to flee to Europe and other countries.  According to the Belgian newspaper, Politico, during this time more than 650,000 Ukrainian men fit for service fled from the country. However, the actual statistical figures are much higher. The London Guardian on 29th June 2024...

Britain joins the war in Ukraine

by K Hill While the US has brought about regime change in Ukraine with the Maidan coup in 2014, installing a thinly disguised neo-Nazi government of Banderites and corrupt politicians to loot its resources, sell its land and saddle it with massive debts thanks to dodgy IMF loans, the UK has been heavily involved in the training of their military – now the second largest European army (after Turkey) in NATO.  The UK involvement has involved everything from bringing Ukrainian commanders for "special training" in the UK, Nazi tattoos on show much to the embarrassment of the British media, to the existence of special advisors, in reality SAS and SBS units, to supervise "on the ground" the attacks on Snake Island and Kerch Bridge.  This is the real reason our British press has been so obsessed with these two "targets" over the past two years, despite their lack of strategic importance, because they are great PR and distract the British public from the grim real...

NATO in deep crisis as the dangers to Zelensky grow

  by Theo Russell The current direction of the war in Ukraine has created an acute crisis in Western capitals, above all in Washington, and the position of Vladimir Zelensky, the president elected on a promise to end the war in Eastern Ukraine, now hangs by a thread. We must make clear here that this is not a war between Ukraine and Russia; this is a war forced on Russia by the NATO alliance. Ukraine is merely a proxy for NATO and is paying a horrific price for this war. The weaknesses of the once mighty NATO alliance have been exposed: after decades of relocating factories to developing countries they have now discovered that they are no longer able to produce sufficient weapons for a major sustained war. In contrast Russia, which Western experts love to claim has a GDP the size of Italy, has proved to be a manufacturing superpower with a highly skilled workforce and mighty technological and scientific resources. Russia has not only increased arms production, from bullets to hyper...