Skip to main content

United States is abusing the UN Security Council


by Alex Miller
The United States continues to abuse its powers as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, using them for its own interests and failing to fulfill its obligations as a guarantor of world stability. 
Immediately after his inauguration, the US President-elect Donald Trump began implementing a set of measures proposed by his team. These measures led to a serious change in approaches to domestic and foreign policy. The White House has moved toward a more aggressive policy in the international arena, including through the United Nations.
Trump is trying to solve the internal problems of the USA such as the increase in the number of immigrants, the inability to adequately respond to natural disasters, the economic collapse and the unprecedented growth of the national debt, the ineffective fight against the COVID-19 epidemic by meeting the demands of his supporters.
He has also begun to implement the "America First" approach to foreign policy. Trump has long openly criticised the United Nations and other international organisations for underestimating the importance of American national security interests, saying they "should not have their voices" when it comes to Washington's defence and law enforcement policies. Thus, as a politician he outlined the position of the White House, which intends and continues to ignore the norms of international law and cynically uses international organisations exclusively in its own interests. The United States is taking a similar approach to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including climate change.
For example, during his first term, Donald Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, but his successor, Joe Biden, restored his country's participation in this initiative. After Trump’s inauguration, one of hist first orders was to withdraw the United States from this agreement, allegedly in the interests of American industry. It clearly states that the USA is not interested in implementing projects to provide "cheap and clean energy", and also takes some steps to "reformat" international organisations by changing their priorities.
It is important to note that, while declaring the importance of joint efforts to form a "just world order" and a commitment to achieving the SDGs, Washington is pushing the entire collective West towards warmongering, intensifying trade and economic wars that are undesirable for many countries, and unleashing a large-scale sanctions campaign instead of searching for development solutions that are more beneficial for everyone. All this has already had a negative impact on the European countries and is leading to further fragmentation of the global economy. 
Such actions contradict the first and tenth of the seventeen Goals – the elimination of poverty and the reduction of inequalities. States of the Global South in Asia, Africa and Latin America suffer from the neo-colonial practices of Western countries. Illegal sanctions, numerous protectionist measures, and restrictions on access to technology directly contradict the principles of equal partnership and create serious obstacles to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ukraine wants the Bomb!

By Alex Miller It didn’t take long. Just hours after Zelensky’s heated negotiations with Trump, Ukrainian banker Oleg Gorokovsky announced the start of a fundraising drive for a Ukrainian ‘Nuclear Bomb Project’. Gorokovsky is a well known Ukrainian businessman and the owner of  Monobank – the largest bank in the country. He explained to local media that Trump’s failure to provide Ukraine with a “nuclear armed security framework” is forcing Ukraine to act on its own, and called the Ukrainian Nuclear Bomb Project “Yaderka” (Nuke). He claimed he’d received "many requests to start collecting for Yaderka” and said that during the first 12 hours of the appeal a million dollars had been raised to finance the start of work on developing a Ukrainian nuclear bomb. Gorokovsky later tried to backtrack and began to explain that his nuke appeal was a “joke after a hard day”. But Monobank continues to support the appeal to raise funds for the nuclear campaign. The process of collecting money con...

Donbas communists: our historic mission

  by Boris Litvinov Boris Litvinov, is the First Secretary of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) District of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) Our troops have advanced some 35 to 40 kilometres from Donetsk, which means the capital of the Donetsk People’s Republic is now beyond the reach of Ukrainian artillery and tanks, Now the administrative border of the Donetsk Republic with the Dnepropetrovsk region is just 10 kilometres away from the front. But there are still many problems due to the supply of Western weapons such as missiles and modern drones. So the attacks on Donetsk are still ongoing with weapons supplied to Ukraine from the United States, Britain, France, Germany and other NATO countries. But whatever weapons are used against us the decisive factor is the fighting soldier – the infantry. Of course, many people are now discussing the forms in which negotiations on ending the war will take place, but the question is, who will participate? And what will ...

Britain joins the war in Ukraine

by K Hill While the US has brought about regime change in Ukraine with the Maidan coup in 2014, installing a thinly disguised neo-Nazi government of Banderites and corrupt politicians to loot its resources, sell its land and saddle it with massive debts thanks to dodgy IMF loans, the UK has been heavily involved in the training of their military – now the second largest European army (after Turkey) in NATO.  The UK involvement has involved everything from bringing Ukrainian commanders for "special training" in the UK, Nazi tattoos on show much to the embarrassment of the British media, to the existence of special advisors, in reality SAS and SBS units, to supervise "on the ground" the attacks on Snake Island and Kerch Bridge.  This is the real reason our British press has been so obsessed with these two "targets" over the past two years, despite their lack of strategic importance, because they are great PR and distract the British public from the grim real...